Here's some artwork that came to me, in a nightmare.
Or, the reverse of rescue.
You know, if an animal is used to certain conditions, the animal can become completely unhinged by any change in those conditions, even if they are better for the animal.
Take a puppy mill dog. An animal that has never felt grass, or the sun, or fresh air, all of it's life. An animal that has never been socialized to people. An animal kept locked in a basement.
Take that animal out into the light and love of day, and BaM. Psychological meltdown occurs, until the animal finally gets over/forgets his initial life. I remember a Cesar Milan episode, where a woman had rescued a hound from a research lab. The animal was petrified by everything, and it took a very, very long time for the animal to let that past go.
Cesar says animals live in the moment, and I believe that to be true. If you turn their "normal" worlds upside down, it will take great training/compassion/patience/empathy, to bring that animal around. They have many moments they must forget, too.
My fictional horse has had his world turned upside down, in a reverse of rescue. From a long life of good food, good care, grooming/handling, riding, turn-out, cleanliness, other horses companionship, black-smithing, etc., he has become a neglected, filthy, skinny, utterly lonely horse. He patiently takes it, like the perfect gentleman that he is.
His BCS score right now? Probably a three, maybe three and a half. He's gained some weight back, as I said. I'd call his condition as of July 8 at about a 2.5.
But I am overly emotional, as we all know. Prone to fiction, not fact. Maybe those ribs are supposed to be there. Maybe it's just a "different" look now, for this horse. Maybe he's okay.
Truly amazing what food will do. And what it won't do, when you don't feed it.
Losing muscle tone is to be expected, of course, when the animal gets no exercise.
Evil thoughts about rescue..
OH, and here's an evil thought I had. I think we should abolish all animal shelters, and euth all of the animals still awaiting homes.
Then, any further animals not wanted anymore, will have truly no place to go.
Do you think that would stop the downpour?
It could stop the people who think "Oh, I'll just take old Fluffy to the shelter, now that I'm tired of her". These people would have to actually take responsibility for their actions with their own animals. Daughter is suddenly allergic? Your problem, not mine.
It would force people like me to keep a stray, or to take care of it's future, myself. I've taken two cats to the shelter, and cried my eyes out both times. If there wasn't a shelter, I'd have had to have kept them, or euthed them, myself.
Just some food for thought, of course, I'm not entirely serious. Private rescues, fine. But no more publicly funded services. Obviously, they are doing such a crappy job, they cannot be trusted. Let's do away with them entirely!
Want to get rid of your dog? Tell your kid the truth about what happens! Dog was killed, because we didn't want him anymore!
This evil thought occurred to me, as I read an OSPCA disliker's comment on facebook. He said "The OSPCA should be caring for our animals properly".
OUR animals?? Last I looked, my animals were living the perfect doggie life.
The OSPCA's animals are not "ours". They are very often owned by people who couldn't care less what happens to them next.
No, not always. But I worked at a shelter. That was the case, most of the time.
Clearing the air
1 year ago
9 comments:
You know what GL, to an extent I totally agree with you. I DEFINITELY see where you are coming from.
When I worked at the clinic in highschool, there was an area for the strays and yep they could only stay so long. They were ALL very nice cats (and a few dogs) and the sad thing is I don't remember any of them ever being adopted out.
We even had people drop off PERFECTLY healthy 8/9 yr old cats to be EUTHED saying "oh, we dont have time for her anymore." My boss was a battleaxe, yes, but she hated nothing more than people like that(becuase she LOVED cats.)
Shelters are a great idea in theory, take in those who need shelter/food/water/care and turn their lives around by rehoming them. Reality check! Reality sucks.
Spay/neuter please, and yeah, take some responsibility for your animals.
OUR animals ARE perfectly happy. THe ones we keep at home, and you know, care for and look after UNTIL THE END. (I think the term is "forever home")
Strange world.
"The OSPCA should be caring for our animals properly". ???? If you give your animal to shelter ,you give up the right to decide anything about its care .sad but true that the availability of shelters makes pets a disposable comodity .I wnder if instead of paying to adopt, people had to pay double to drop them off if that would have an impact .Though they would likey make an even less reasonable choice
I completely get the sentiment about doing away with shelters and rescues.
Darn thing about shelters was that weren't they created to give people a place to take animals that they were going to dump regardless? On the street or out in the country?
Having shelters/rescues hasn't made people more irresponsible. Taking them away isn't going to make the jerks of the world more responsible either.
The whole point was to provide a place for the animals to go so they did not have to the sudden loss of a roof over their head, food and water. Because there are complete morons out there that think some magical survival instinct kicks in if they 'set an animal free'.
Growing up where I did-we did get rid of animals ourselves. Whether they be strays or dumped, if we did not decide to take on the respoinsibility of caring for them (which we did on several), they got bullet. Actually, that is mostly what is still done today because there is no shelters and no rescues to either come get the animals or to take them too. Unless you want to drive 75 miles in any direction.
As far as horses, I'm tired of the rhetoric that the end of U.S. slaughter is what caused the downturn of the market. What a load of crap. Just as many horses are still going to slaughter now as was then. In my ever so humble and worthless opinion it was the onset of equine 'rescues' that damaged the market long before they ever shut down the U.S. slaughter plants. Wel, that, and the extreme number of horses that was on the market with huge numbers being added yearly due to everyone and their neighbor thinking that raising babies for 'the market' was a money earner. Hahahahaha
Things are getting worse in society though-so many people are all about things being disposable. Products, friends, pets. What they heck, they can all be replaced right? Houses aren't homes anymore-they are assets. Cars are status symbols-not a means of transportation. Pets are picked based on what has currently been made popular-not based on what is the best pick for a person or family.
Ughh-Sorry for the rant. I have no answers for any of it. It's really not the animals that are 'worthless' in most cases...it's the people.
I couldn't agree more there GL! Very well said.
'Our Animals' in a way, because if it is a city or state run/funded shelter- WE pay for it through our taxes. So in a way, they are 'our animals', but if the collective 'our animals' assholes would step up to the plate and take care of 'their animals' that they chose to dump off- there wouldn't be a need for such places.
Our animals are here for life, unless there comes a legitimate reason to sell one. Then they are found a good home, hopefully with someone with similar views on the matter.
Even the vet clinics are often turned to as 'dumping grounds' by the ignorant asshats who come in saying Euthanize the puppy because it peed on my floor... without bothering to explain- I never bothered to attempt potty training.
It's no wonder why so few of us actually like a slim few of the rest of our species.
I'm still holding out hope for the horse. They may live in the moment, but they do have amazing memories. Some are just blessed with great coping skills and can get through things while seeming unphased.
Interesting question indeed.
I am so tired of the 'someone should do something' folks who set policies that are completely unrealistic, refuse to see the other side of the equation, and deny that their policies have consequences. Who feel (whoa, Freudian slip, had typed fool!) like they should get a free pass because they have good intentions. Who pass laws and trot off patting themselves on the back, but never lift a hand themselves, or have to face the consequences of their 'good intentions.'
Animals and children need consistent and accountable adults to step up and face reality.
Can you tell I'm currently dealing with a stray child who is told at school "your parents should teach you" and the parents are saying "the school is paid to teach you?!" Why has no one noticed that this child has not been taught? It's not my job, but if I don't do something this child is going to wind up in jail.
Okay, rant over for now...
I agree with FV- charge double for dropping them off. Great post, GL.
Are you kidding me?? This is abuse mind you!! Any rescues in your neighborhood?? Try to find one close by, contact them and tell them what is going on. This animal is not in good shape! Where are you located??
Hi DCS, thanks for stopping by. According to our laws, this is not abuse.
You cannot "rescue" a horse, when the owner is not willing to surrender or sell the horse.
The owner sees nothing wrong with him.
The OSPCA can only monitor the situation, and file reports of non-compliance with directions they've left her. You know, things like, feed him, water him, exercise him. Mucking him out would be nice, too.
She has HAD to feed him more.
I'm asking, what do you think his BCS was July 8? Now?
OH, and great rants, all of you!
Notice the absence of spam?
YES to comment moderation, I'm afraid.
Yours in the fight to end spam, unless it's in a monty python sketch..
Post a Comment